Date Range

Sort By

Stories
9 results of 9

All promises the Port can do in Snohomish are just promises but a tax is forever

PORT OF EVERETT BALLOT MEASURE

A letter in the July 31 Tribune refuting and responding to multiple statements made in favor of the Port of Everett Proposition 1.

Hi-rises not needed to meet Snohomish population growth, ADUs can do it

AFFORDABLE HOUSING CONCEPTS

A response to a letter to the editor in the Jan. 10, 2024 Tribune.

‘Pro’ statement for FD4 levy in voter’s pamphlet uses faulty logic

FIRE DISTRICT 4 EMS LEVY MEASURE

A letter in the May 28 Tribune speaking to why the 'pro' statement for the August Fire District 4 levy in the voter's pamphlet is faulty in the letter writer's opinion.

Ready to face these utility rate increases?

SNOHOMISH UTILITY BILLS

A letter to the editor about utility bills in the Sept. 25 Tribune.

State pay-by-mile tax model fair approach, but delete gas tax then

STATE PAY-BY-MILE PROPOSAL

A reader explains why Pay-by-Mile is fair for EV and gas owners only if the gasoline tax is eliminated.

Why is Port asking to tax more people?

PORT OF EVERETT BALLOT MEASURE

A letter to the editor in the May 29 Tribune.

Tell Council not to voice support

CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION FOR PORT

A letter in the June 26th Tribune opposing an idea put forward to the City Council.

ADU connection fees contrary to affordable housing goals

NEW SNOHOMISH ADU LAWS

A letter to the editor in the Aug. 28 Tribune telling Snohomish to reverse its adoption of utility hookup connection fees for new detached ADUs.

Fire District 4 is flush with cash, vote no on tax measure

FIRE DISTRICT 4 EMS LEVY MEASURE

A letter to the editor opposing the August EMS levy that outlines the statement Snohomish Fire District 4 has large pockets.

More Stories

[]